The NCAA is also considered a non-profit company. Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. Many generations of an individual family might attend a school like the University of Alabama, making connections at fraternities and sororities that will be beneficial throughout their professional life.
Contrary to what all the opponents believe, being an athlete is a full-time job. Student-athletes would be paid for this and all the additional benefits they provide for their schools. College Athletes Getting Paid?
Sometimes money is needed. How do you fix one disparity without creating another? Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents. At first, it was a great place to watch athletes play sports while making sure the rules were being followed.
We were on the road all the time, even gone for two straight weeks at one point. Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams. But if you compensate student-athletes monetarily, how do you decide who gets paid?
Like any other business, colleges go into default and close when they are not making money or advancing financially. Third, the athletic programs.
Coaches receive bonuses for breaking records, reaching the offseason, and winning the big games; the athletes receive none of it, writes Tyson Hartnett for The Huffington Post.
No one is making kids go to school to make money for the colleges and universities. Many of these athletes come from urban, low-class families and often leave school early because of the unimaginable pressure to be the main provider for their family at a young age.
Yet the beauty of the debate is once again lost because the foundation of the argument sits on a fault line. Almost every college athlete, unless they receive only a partial scholarship or are a walk-on athlete meaning they attend school without a scholarshipwill leave school without any debt.
Where would the money even come from?
It is a trade-off. They and their families choose to do this. Who else makes money off these near-professional level athletes? Packed stadiums and arenas. It covers thousands of dollars in mysterious, unknown university fees, tuition, housing, a meal-plan and multiple hundred-dollar textbooks.
A timeout of the regular-season college football game between the University of Michigan at the University of Iowa Photo: Most college graduates will leave college with a diploma and the financial burden of college debt. First, their own coaches.
If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. Yes, college athletes, particularly those who play revenue-producing sports, deserve some form of compensation outside of their scholarship.
We allow the "school" part to blind us into thinking that the educational piece changes the dynamics of what is really going on and exempts athletics from being about something other than money. Which is why every college athlete needs to ask: They agree to that. Will a salary for college-athletes ever come to be?
Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. Money will only add to this fact. Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship.
All businesses justify what they pay their employees, and unless there are labor laws being broken, then that business should be absolved of being told how to go about making money. It is why we, the general public, need to simply stop looking at universities and colleges as places of education and instead focus on them as places of business where education just happens to be a service they provide.I'm not saying we should be paying athletes $5, or even $10, per semester.
If each athlete got $2, paid over the course of the semester, this would give them some spending cash and an. If college athletes were to be paid, their passion for the game may remain the same but their motives would change. For now, let’s put the logistics of the matter to the side and focus on the morals.
In college sports you play to get to the pros, not to earn a paycheck as a student.” says Josh cooper of mint-body.com What people forget about college athletes is that they are student athletes.
The word student comes before athlete. No one in college gets paid to get an A+ or pass an important test.
These conversations inevitably turned to whether or not the athletes should be paid. One instance stands out: A group of young men from the football team had been consigned to Heritage Hall for an.
Jan 30, · The NCAA disagrees with the petition, arguing that student-athletes are not "employees" under federal law. There are many reasons why NCAA athletes should be. An athlete like Manziel, the Heisman Trophy winner, is valuable to Texas A&M, but there’s a simple fact Time and most advocates of compensating college athletes fail to consider: Texas A&M.Download